ANALISA PERBANDINGAN DIFERENSIASI PRODUK PADA RADUSA.CO dan MAPLE_ID

merita bernik, Thifal Al thavia Dwinandita (Universitas Padjadjaran)

Abstract


In Indonesia the fashion business developments take place quite rapidly. Along with the increased efforts in the field of fashion, causing competition among entrepreneurs engaged in the same field. Various strategies drawn up by the employers in order to win or retain its position as market leader. There are many businesses especially fashion handbags are such change or modify the appearance of the product. When talking about the uniqueness of bags for teenagers and adults may employers bag will compete to create innovative products to create a variety of sizes and colors, unlike the case with the children's work unique bags are bags production Radusa Company and Maple Indonesia.

The research method used is a mix method that is quantitative method and qualitative method, to be able to describe a certain condition about product differentiation at Radusa Company and Maple Indonesa. The sampling technique used is nonprobability sampling with purposive method, where the sample is the consumer who is at least 16 years old. For each company taken a sample of 30 consumers.

The results of this study indicate that the outline of Radusa Company has differentiated the product in terms of shape, quality of performance, suitability of quality, durability, reliability, ease of improvement and style. While Maple Indonesia has a differentiation of products viewed from the form, features, quality performance, quality conformance, durability, reliability, ease of improvement and style. Based on the respondent's statement about the comparison of product differentiation and Wilcoxon test, it is found that Radusa Company is better than Maple Indonesia

 

 


Keywords


Product Differentiation, Fashion, Comparison

Full Text:

PDF
Abstract views : 113 | PDF views : 52

References


Analisis Untuk Perancangan Strategi Pemasaran. Yogyakarta : UPP STIM YKPN.

Ali Hasan. 2013. Marketing dan Kasus – Kasus Pilihan. Yogyakarta : CAPS (Center for Academic Publishing Service).

Craven, David W, and Nigel F, Piercy. 2006. Strategic Marketing, 8th edition. New York: Mc Graw Hill Inc.

Daryanto. 2013. Sari Kuliah Manajemen Pemasaran. Cetakan II. Januari 2013. PT. Sarana Tutorial Nurani Sejahtera. Bandung.

Djaslim Saladin. 2011. Perilaku Konsumen dan Pemasaran strategik. Bandung : Agung Ilmu.

Fandy Tjiptono. 2011. Pemasaran Jasa. Jatim : Bayumedia Publishing.

Kotler, Philip 2009. Manajemen Pemasaran. Edisi 13 Jilid 1. Jakarta : Erlangga.

____________ dan Kevin Keller. 2007. Manajemen Pemasaran, Edisi Kedua Belas, Jilid I. Jakarta:PT Indeks.

____________ dan Gary Armstrong. 2012. Principle of Marketing, 15th edition. New Jersey : Prentice Hall.

____________ dan Gary Armstrong. 2014. Principle of Marketing, 15th edition. New Jersey : Prentice Hall.

____________ dan Kevin Keller. 2016. Marketing Management, 15th Global Edition. England : Pearson Educationn Limited.

Sugiono. 2012. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan Rd. Bandung : Alfabeta.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30988/jmil.v1i2.43

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Jurnal Manajemen Industri dan Logistik

 
 

Creative Commons License
Jurnal Manajemen Industri dan Logistik Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License

 
View My Stats