IMPLEMENTASI DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING UNTUK MENENTUKAN AKTOR PADA RANTAI PASOK
Abstract
ABSTRAK
Pada sebuah rantai pasok penentuan aktor pemasok, produsen dan konsumen, menjadi fokus dari arus material yang efektif. Pada penelitian ini dilaksanakan sebuah studi kasus pada komoditas rumput laut, meliputi aktor petani rumput laut (plant), penampungan (warehouse), pengolahan awal (initial product), pengemasan (packing), dan pengguna akhir (final product). Terdapat lima objek yang diamati dari setiap aktor, yang akan menjadi pengamatan. Metodologi penelitian yang dimanfaatkan adalah pendekatan kuantitatif yang dimulai dengan menyebarkan kuesioner kepada responden yang terlibat disetiap aktor. Kuesioner memperhatikan faktor sumberdaya alam (natural resources),sumber daya manusia (labour), darana pendukung (infrastructure), peralatan yang dimanfaatkan (technology), pendidikan (education), kebijakan (policy), serta kondisi ekonomi (economy).Hasil survey diberikan bobot, dengan menggunakan Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Hasil pembotan selanjutnya menjadi masukan untuk programa dinamis, di mana dihasilkan beberapa alternatif rantai pasok, yang akan dipilih. Berdasarkan hasil perhitungan programa dinamis, secara efektif telah mampu mendapatkan aktor yang mampu secara berkesinambungan untuk bekerjasama mengalirkan arus material dari hulu ke hilir, yang ditunjukkan oleh Efektifitas akumulasi bobot yang terbesar.
Kata kunci: Rantai Pasok, Aktor, AHP, Programa Dinamis.
References
Ali, S. & Nakade, K., 2015. A Mathematical Optimization Approach to Supply Chain Disruptions Management Considering Disruptions to Suppliers and Distribution Centers. OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 8(2), pp. 57-66.
Beamon, B., 2008. Sustainability and The Future of The Supply Chain Management. OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 1(1), pp. 4-18.
Digalwar, A., Borade, A. & Metri, B., 2014. A Fuzzy AHP Approach for Supplier Selection. OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 7(2), pp. 46-53.
Doan, L., Amer, Y., Lee, S. & Phuc, P., 2018. Optimizing the Total Cost of an E-waste Reverse Supply Chain Considering Transportation Risk. OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 11(3), pp. 151-160.
Ganguly, K. & Kumar, G., 2019. Supply Chain Risk Assessment: A Fuzzy AHP Approach. OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 12(1), pp. 1-13.
Hendrawati, T., 2016. Pengolahan Rumput Laut dan Kelayakan Industrinya. Yogyakarta: UMJ Press.
Hudnukar, M., Deshpande, S., Rathod, U. & Jakhar, S., 2017. Supply Chain Risk Classification Schemes: A Literature Review. OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 10(4), pp. 182-199.
Hurtado, A., Critchley, A. & Neish, I., 2017. Tropical Seaweed Farming Trends, Problems and Opportunities. Amsterdam: Springer.
Lin, S. & Juang, Y., 2008. Selecting Green Suppliers with Analytic Hierarchy Process for Biotechnology Industry. OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 1(2), pp. 115-129.
Mouloua, Z. & Oulamara, A., 2007. DYNAMIC PROGRAMMING APPROACH FOR MINIMIZING TRANSPORTATION COSTS IN A SUPPLY CHAIN. Sibiu-Romania, IFAC MCPL.
Moore, L.J., Lee, S.M. & Taylor, B.W., Management Science, 4th Edition. New York. Pearson.
Mujkic, Z., Qorri, A. & Kraslawski, A., 2018. Sustainability and Optimization of Supply Chains: a Literature Review. OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 11(4), pp. 186-199.
Pudjiastuti, S., 2018. Laporan Kinerja Kementrian Kelautan dan Perikanan. Jakarta: KKP.
Pujawan, I., 2017. Operations and Supply Chain Management: Towards Ten Years of Journey. OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 10(1), pp. 1-3.
Singh, R.K,. & Acharya, P., 2014. An AHP Model Approach to Supply Chain Flexibility: A Case Study of Indian FMCG Firm. OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 7(2), pp. 64-69.
Salim, Z. & Ernawati, 2015. Info Komoditi Rumput Laut. Jakarta: Al Mawardi Prima.
Schmitt, R., Quattelbaum, B. & Falk, B., 2010. Distribution of Customer Perception Information within The Supply Chain. OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 3(2), pp. 94-104.
Sodhi, M. & Tang, C., 2008. Is the East Following the West or Its Own Destiny for Industrial Development A Research Agenda on Supply-Chain Management. OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 1(1), pp. 19-30.
Spens, K. & Wisner, J., 2009. A Study of Supply Chain Management Practices in Finland and the United States. OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 2(2), pp. 79-92.
Surjandari, I., Sudarto, S. & Anggarini, S., 2010. Supplier Selection in JIT Automotive Industry A Multivariate Approach. OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 3(2), pp. 83-93.
Tiwari, B. & Troy, G., 2015. Seaweed Sustainability Food and Non-Food Applications. London: Elsevier.
Tundys, B., 2018. Use of Quantitative and Qualitative Methods for Modelling Green Supply Chain. OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 11(2), pp. 82-97.
Zailani, S., PremKumar, R. & Fernando, Y., 2008. Factors Influencing the Effectiveness of Operational Information Sharing Within Supply Chain Channels in Malaysia. OPERATIONS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, 1(2), pp. 85-100.
