PVC Resin Supplier Selection with Integration of AHP and TOPSIS Methods

Frydella Krisna Putri(1), Farida Pulansari(2),


(1) Pembangunan National "Veteran" University, East Java
(2) Pembangunan National "Veteran" University, East Java
Corresponding Author

Abstract


Choosing the right suppliers is important for companies to provide raw materials for production in the long run. The sustainability of production activities is tightly controlled by suppliers in the manufacturing industry. A company in Mojokerto that manufactures PVC pipes falls under the plastic pipe industry sector. Raw materials for PVC resins must be ensured through assessments of suppliers. This study was conducted to determine which resin supplier was the best based on predetermined criteria. Variable include: price, quality, delivery, quantity accuracy, and service. To determine the order of preference for resin suppliers, this study uses AHP, which gives the individual a probability score for each criterion, and TOPSIS, which gives the user an indication of which supplier to choose when selecting a resin. As a result of data processing, suppliers are ranked based on their preferences. The preference values for each supplier are: supplier 1, which is 0.927; supplier 2, which is 0.739; supplier 3, which is 0.091; and supplier 4, which is 0.267. There are five parameters used in this study, and quality is known to have an influence of about 47% on the four suppliers. However, the delivery and service parameters only contribute 5%.

Keywords


AHP, PVC Resin, Supplier Selection, TOPSIS

References


S. P. T. Talangkas and F. Pulansari, “Pemilihan Supplier Semen Pada Cv. Rizki Jaya Abadi Di Kabupaten Mojokerto Menggunakan Metode Fuzzy Ahp (Analytical Hierarchy Process),” Tekmapro J. Ind. Eng. Manag., vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 72–83, July 2021, doi: 10.33005/tekmapro.v16i2.202.

D. M. Utama, “AHP and TOPSIS Integration for Green Supplier Selection: A Case Study in Indonesia,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1845, no. 1, March 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1845/1/012015.

R. Alikhani, S. A. Torabi, and N. Altay, “Strategic supplier selection under sustainability and risk criteria,” Int. J. Prod. Econ., 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.018.

M. Marzouk and M. Sabbah, “AHP-TOPSIS social sustainability approach for selecting supplier in construction supply chain,” Clean. Environ. Syst., vol. 2, p. 100034, April 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cesys.2021.100034.

S. Khoshfetrat, M. R. Galankashi, and M. Almasi, “Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation : a fuzzy approach,” Eng. Optim., vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 1–14, October 2019, doi: 10.1080/0305215X.2019.1663185.

B. D. Rouyendegh, A. Yildizbasi, and P. Üstünyer, “Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS method for green supplier selection problem,” Soft Comput., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 2215–2228, May 2019, doi: 10.1007/s00500-019-04054-8.

S. Rezaei and J. Behnamian, “Strategic supplier selection based on modified sandcone theory and alignment principle,” Sustain. Prod. Consum., vol. 26, pp. 256–274, April 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2020.10.013.

J. F. Tsai, C. P. Wang, M. H. Lin, and S. W. Huang, “Analysis of key factors for supplier selection in taiwan’s thin-film transistor liquid-crystal displays industry,” Mathematics, vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 1–19,February 2021, doi: 10.3390/math9040396.

L. Fei, Y. Deng, and Y. Hu, “DS-VIKOR: A New Multi-criteria Decision-Making Method for Supplier Selection,” Int. J. Fuzzy Syst., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 157–175, February 2019, doi: 10.1007/s40815-018-0543-y.

T. W. Chang, C. J. Pai, H. W. Lo, and S. K. Hu, “A hybrid decision-making model for sustainable supplier evaluation in electronics manufacturing,” Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 156, p. 107283, June 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cie.2021.107283.

I. Pratiwi, H. MZ, and S. Aprilyanti, “Pemilihan Supplier Terbaik Penyedia Barang Consumable Menggunakan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process (Studi kasus di Departemen Pengadaan Barang PT. PUSRI),” J. Manaj. Ind. dan Logistik, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 147–158, November 2018, doi: 10.30988/jmil.v2i2.35.

P. Wangchen Bhutia and R. Phipon, “Application of AHP and TOPSIS Method for Supplier Selection Problem,” IOSR J. Eng., vol. 02, no. 10, pp. 43–50, 2012, doi: 10.9790/3021-021034350.

D. S. Pitchaiah, M. Hussaian, and D. Govardhan, “A review on multi attribute decision making for evaluation and selection of supplier for materials,” Proceedings, vol. 39, pp. 296–300, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.201.

F. Kutlu Gündoğdu and A. Karasan, “Selection of Best Hospital for Kidney Transplantation Using Ahp: a Case for Turkey,” ISAHP Web Conf., pp. 3–5, December 2020, doi: 10.13033/isahp.y2020.058.

S. Akbaş and T. Erbay Dalkiliç, “Multi-criteria supplier selection based on fuzzy pairwise comparison in AHP,” Gazi Univ. J. Sci., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 296–308, January 2018.

S. R. Rahmi and Firman, “Analysis of Supplier Selection by Using the AHP and PROMETHEE Methods in Regional Public Hospital Padang (RSUD Padang),” Int. Conf. Econ. Educ. Econ. Bus. Manag., vol. 97, pp. 796–805, September 2019, doi: 10.2991/piceeba-19.2019.87.

S. Wibawa, A. D. Ekawati, B. Maryadi, and N. Fitriyani, “Jurnal Manajemen Industri dan Logistik Komparasi Fuzzy AHP , TOPSIS dan SMART untuk pemilihan supplier Comparison Fuzzy AHP , TOPSIS and SMART methods for suppliers selection,” J. Manaj. Ind. dan Logistik, vol. 05, no. 02, pp. 121–129, November 2021.

F. A. Setyaningsih, “Analisis Kinerja Technique For Order Preference By Similarity To Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) Untuk Pemilihan Program Studi,” J. Inform. J. Pengemb. IT Poltek Tegal, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 43–46, July 2017, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal.poltektegal.ac.id/index.php/informatika/article/view/529.

D. Rimantho, F. Fathurohman, B. Cahyadi, and S. Sodikun, “Pemilihan Supplier Rubber Parts Dengan Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process Di PT.XYZ,” J. Rekayasa Sist. Ind., vol. 6, no. 2, p. 93, 2017, doi: 10.26593/jrsi.v6i2.2094.93-104.

D. K. Devi and A. Wardhana, “Analysis and Design of the Best Suppliers Selection Case Study : Department Store Kopetri with the Ahp and Topsis Methods,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Mob. Comput., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 109–120, June 2018.

K. Mukherjee, Supplier Selection An MCDA-Based Approach, Springer, Studies in System, Decision and Control. 2017.

S. Kusumadewi, S. Hartati, A. Harjoko, and R. Wardoyo, Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM). 2006.

T. Cakar and B. Çavuş, “Supplier selection process in dairy industry using fuzzy topsis method,” Oper. Res. Eng. Sci. Theory Appl., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 82–98, April 2021, doi: 10.31181/oresta2040182c.

A. Kresta, “Judgment scales and consistency measure in AHP,” vol. 12, pp. 164–173, March 2014, doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00332-3.

H. S. Kilic and A. S. Yalcin, “Modified two-phase fuzzy goal programming integrated with IF-TOPSIS for green supplier selection,” Appl. Soft Comput. J., vol. 93, p. 106371, April 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2020.106371.

C. Yu, Z. Zou, Y. Shao, and F. Zhang, “An integrated supplier selection approach incorporating decision maker’s risk attitude using ANN, AHP and TOPSIS methods,” Kybernetes, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 2263–2284, August 2019, doi: 10.1108/K-04-2019-0223.

N. Vafaei, R. A. Ribeiro, and L. M. Camarinha-matos, “Data normalisation techniques in decision making : case study with TOPSIS method,” vol. 10, no. 1, 2018. Available at: doi: 10.1504/IJIDS.2018.090667

R. Kumar, S. S. Padhi, and A. Sarkar, “Supplier selection of an Indian heavy locomotive manufacturer: An integrated approach using Taguchi loss function, TOPSIS, and AHP,” IIMB Manag. Rev., vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 78–90, September 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.iimb.2018.08.008.

G. Adam and T. S. Imaroh, “Analysis of Supplier Selection of Corn Starch Raw Material,” vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 108–123, December 2019, doi: 10.31933/DIJMESS.


Full Text: PDF - full text

Article Metrics

Abstract View : 53 times
PDF - full text Download : 37 times

 DOI: 10.30988/jmil.v6i1.952

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.